The Importance of Sustainability in Businesses

In a world plagued with increasingly harmful environmental habits and lack of knowledge in the realm of sustainability, there is great value in taking strides to minimize a company’s environmental footprint and inspiring others to do the same. Those who do not recognize and embrace more environmentally conscious business plans will inevitably suffer.

Businesses are recognizing that sustainability is becoming mainstream, meaning if they are not making the efforts, people will wonder why and make comparisons to those who are. Some will even take their businesses elsewhere for moral purposes. In fact, sustainability efforts can play a huge role in securing a good brand reputation among its audiences. Sustainability is becoming a significant concern to company strategies, customers and stakeholders, all of which contribute to overall level of success.

In fact, the Natural Marketing Institute discovered that 58 percent of consumers take into consideration a company’s impact on the environment when purchasing goods and services, meaning they are more likely to give their businesses to those that are sustainable, even if the product costs more. Through the development of sustainability strategies that align with businesses’ products and established brand, they can tap into this new market while still remaining true to core values.

With this, sustainable businesses are often the most innovative because they are constantly reviewing processes to find new solutions. A company that refuses to acknowledge the need for sustainability will remain dormant and eventually fall behind those that have acknowledged it and altered plans to fit a more sustainable future.

Though real sustainability efforts can be difficult tasks, they push the company to be and do better in all ways, which can increase profit. Sustainability has also been shown to produce new demands and markets for businesses. If customers demand socially and environmentally-friendly products and services, then companies must alter old products or create new ones to fit their desires. Further, if a company strives to be sustainable in all matters, it fosters a common goal between projects.

Other companies are integrating new solutions to create meaningful and sustained change. For example, the industrial corporation Alcoa dedicates a fifth of its executive cash compensation to safety, diversity and environmental stewardship. Coca Cola improved the efficiency of its water use by 20 percent and identified the need for a rigorous third-party evaluation of its water management approach. The computer company Dell works to use alternative, recycled and recyclable materials in its products and packaging designs as part of its commitment to reduce its overall energy intensity by 80 percent by 2020.

Additionally, Ford Motor Company avidly works with suppliers on emission reduction and energy efficiency targets. Once these companies realized how much they and the environment could benefit from sustainable habits, they began to shift their practices, as should all.

It is no longer a question of whether or not sustainable business practices are important; they simply are.

Instead, the questions revolve around how businesses are going to shift their corporate social responsibility to better suit the planet. Incorporating sustainability into everyday business endeavors is not only helpful to the environment, but also to the overall success of businesses. In seemingly small ways, a company can make big changes. Sustainability is an issue knocking on the door of the business world today. More and more businesses, regardless of size or standing, are finding that more sustainable practices are leading them to better corporate culture, more reliable products and greater long term profitability.

Brewing Success From Crisis: The History of Starbucks

People flocked to different coffee shops, revenue dangerously dropped and seemingly all hope was lost, a downward spiral that made many people ask, “How did Starbucks recover from such a deafening blow?”

Starbucks first opened its doors in Seattle on March 31, 1971. The company’s founders were University of San Francisco graduates who met while they were students. Jerry Baldwin, an English teacher, Zev Siegl, a history teacher, and Gordon Bowker, a writer, found inspiration for high-quality coffee beans and equipment in the teachings of Alfred Peet, who had a specific style of roasting beans.

Originally, Bowker owned an advertising agency with Terry Heckler, a man who believed words including “st” were exceptionally powerful. This prompted brainstorming and discovery of a mining town near the Cascade Range called “Starbo.” The research reminded Bowker of “Starbuck,” the first mate in Herman Melville’s classic American novel “Moby Dick,” which discusses the whaling industry. Of course, the name origin is appropriate considering its stores import coffee to the people of Seattle. The name stuck, and the business grew shortly after.

The first version of the famous logo, displaying a twin-tailed siren from Greek mythology, was inspired by the sea. They really began to put the “sea” back in Seattle. The logo has faced various changes throughout the years. The first version illustrated a completely topless mermaid with a double fishtail. The topless nature faced much controversy and eventually sparked the creation of the second version. This version showed her long, flowy mermaid hair covering her breasts, but with her belly button still visible. This time, the tail was cropped and green in color rather than brown. The third version hid both the belly button and breasts and showed very little of the original fish tails.

The original logo was moved to the Starbucks’ Headquarters in Seattle. Starbucks, for a short period of time, placed it on hot-drink cups as an attempt to show the company’s heritage from the Pacific Northwest in celebration of the it reaching 35 years. However, the logo was still quite controversial due to the siren’s exposed chest, but not enough to cause a huge deal. Years later, small changes were made, such as removing the Starbucks mark around the siren, making the image bigger and changing the color.

The original Starbucks is located at 1912 Pike Place. At the beginnings of the company, it sold roasted whole coffee beans and did not yet brew coffee to sell; brewed coffee came only in free samples, and things needed to change. After purchasing green coffee beans from Peet’s for the whole first year of business, Starbucks began buying directly from growers. In the 1990’s, Starbucks expanded beyond Seattle throughout the U.S. then eventually worldwide and became one of the first companies to offer sock to part-time employees. In this time frame, it also became a publicly traded company.

Howard Schultz served as a driving force behind the success of Starbucks from when it had only four outlets. He grew what started as a tiny beansprout to a strong, ever-growing beanstalk. The company owed most everything to his nurturing actions as CEO from 1987 to 2000. Before dedicating his time, energy and passion, Schultz first walked into a Starbucks store in 1981 and was instantly drawn to the excellent and different taste from his first cup of Sumatra.

It was not until he ventured on business endeavors in Italy that he discovered and was extremely impressed by Milan’s espresso bars. He saw the romantic, inviting nature of the Italian coffee experience, and its popularity and culture inspired him to develop the company in Seattle; he saw great success in selling cups of coffee as well as beans. He envisioned a place for conversation and a feeling of community, simply a place somewhere between home and work. After starting his own coffee shop for a bit, Schultz, along with the help of local investors, purchased Starbucks in August of 1987. He grew Starbucks from a regional coffee chain to a global company over a period of 18 years.

When he left after these 18 years, things took a drastic turn.

Companies around the country began severely struggling simultaneously with the economy during the financial crisis of 2008, and Starbucks was not one to be spared. Shutting down 900 stores by 2009, laying off 6,700 employees, and dropping 42 percent in stock, the company reached an all time low. Net income in the first quarter fell to $64.3 million from $208.1 million. Further, revenue fell 5.5 percent and sales at stores that had been opened for a year minimum fell 9 percent also during the first quarter.

However, problems arose before the recession hit; the company just failed to recognize them. The main problem was that people simply stopped going to Starbucks. Over the last three months that ended Dec. 28, the number of people visiting stores decreased 5 percent along with the amount of money people spent when they did visit the stores. People began deeming Starbucks products as too expensive in comparison to other domestic coffee houses and opted for cheapter coffee. In 2008, there was a 3 percent drop in same-store sales. The recession did, in fact, plunge Starbucks into an existential crisis, but much of the damage had already been done.

Jim Donald, who Schultz appointed as CEO after his aforementioned resignation, took the blame for the fall of Starbucks, a result of him opening too many stores in the United States, eradicating the home-like experience of stores and allowing a too drastic explanation. Something monumental needed to be done

On January 8, 2008, Schultz finally returned after an eight year hiatus, during which he served as a chairman, to help dig the company out of a deep hole. Starbucks faced many other problems that only added to its unfortunate financial crisis. First, as it focused more and more on expansion, it began to stray further from guaranteeing its stores as inviting places with frequent new products. The coffee remained, but the warm, inviting nature had vanished.

Starbucks also failed to acknowledge arising competitors and the impact they could have on its own business. McDonald’s, for example, became a competitive force as it began selling espresso. Dunkin Donuts also became a popular place for coffee-lovers. Though they were focused on beating smaller premiere coffee outlets, they ignored big-machine, already established companies that were beginning to jump on the coffee grind.

Schultz returned with a fire under his feet. Almost immediately, he emailed the employees about his concerns regarding losing touch with customers. He wrote with a clear objective towards reigniting the emotional attachment with customers in mind. Refusing to blame the economy and the higher cost of dairy like the leadership he replaced, Schultz recognized Starbucks’ overlooked problems. They used external problems as excuses for raising prices and wrongly exchanged investment in its employees and customers for expansion. The store experience strayed far from how Schultz demanded and wanted it to feel.

“The company shouldn’t just blame the economy; Starbucks’s heavy spending to accommodate its expansion has created a bureaucracy that masked its problems,” Schultz argues. The company had grown from approximately 5,000 stores to 15,000 during his hiatus.

Could it continue to expand while simultaneously preserving its culture and values? Starbucks needed to do one thing: remain true to its core values.

And so the company completely redesigned its stores and created an environment that felt like community rather than corporation, delivering personalized customer service, down to little details like appealing music throughout its stores. Employees were encouraged to think freely and contribute ideas towards how to foster this feeling alongside customers through a program named “My Starbucks Idea.”

Essentially, the program called for opinions on all Starbucks related matters and products and allowed users to personalize drinks through an interactive experience. Fortunately, it was a great success, exceeding 93,000 ideas shared by about 1.3 million users on social media and raising monthly page views to 5.5 million. Coffee-lovers finally began to feel as if their voice mattered, instead of being swallowed by a demand for expansion and profit.

This was the first step towards rebuilding the company’s relationship with its customers. Choosing casual and informal conversation made it easier to capture actual moods and understand the customer experience through real feedback. If the company did not understand its audience, including both their negative and positive thoughts, it could never reach the true level of success that is so desperately desired. Instead, it would fall deeper and deeper into a black hole of separation between corporation and customer. Starbucks knew what it had to do; it just needed actual execution of its plans.

Schultz unveiled a seven-step transformation agenda. The steps were the following:

  1. Be the undisputed coffee authority.
  2. Engage and inspire our partners.
  3. Ignite the emotional attachment with our customers.
  4. Expand our global presence—while making each store the heart of a local neighborhood.
  5. Be a leader in ethical sourcing and environmental impact.
  6. Creative innovation growth platforms worthy of our coffee.
  7. Deliver a sustainable economic model.

“We desperately need to look into the mirror and realize it’s time to get back to the core and make the changes necessary to evoke the heritage, the tradition, and the passion that we all have for the true Starbucks Experience,” Schultz says.

The company began to mold a platform where customers could speak and headquarters would listen, a huge turn from the previous separation. Customers also engaged with each other by creating groups. Through this, Starbucks implemented over 100 ideas and began to reestablish brand trust despite aforementioned difficulties. Starbucks began utilizing technology like this more and more. It wanted to be as innovative as possible. In addition, it had a lot to prove in terms of its quality and consistency, as the company had been questioned for its high prices. It was the focus on relationship building that worked wonders.

The Starbucks mobile app, for example, was implemented before many other competitors began embracing applications and linked to the already existent social media tactics. With a foot in the technology race early on, the company had the chance to become a trendsetter. Other companies later followed suit.

The company launched the Pike Place Roast and the loyalty program, closed stores as it saw fit, and reconstructed its manufacturing and supply operations. In addition, it focused on motivating its partners and store managers, closing more than 7,000 of its stores across the country for “Espresso Excellence Training,” during which they ensured 135,000 baristas could efficiently pour a perfect espresso shot and steam milk.

Starbucks also began considering its employees its partners, offering them stock options and health insurance.

The crisis that plagued Starbucks went far beyond effects of the recession, but through strong efforts to reconnect via social media, the company reclaimed its throne at the top. It proved the power of engagement between customers and products or brands.

Now, Starbucks is back and better than ever. Opening 603 new stores just last year and bringing the total count across 75 countries to over 28,000 stores, Starbucks has grown from much more than just a one store, unknown Seattle-based company. Starbucks can be found anywhere and everywhere and has plans to continue expansion in whatever areas are deemed fit.

Starbucks has grown by an average of at least two stores every day for the past 27 years, yet maintained the comfortable, home-like experience it desperately needed during the crisis. There are 36,000 possible frappuccino combinations, and the company reported a record-setting $19.2 billion in sales last year. While there is seemingly not a place lacking a Starbucks, the company has managed to continue expansion while not straying from its core values like before.

Kevin Johnson served as the president and chief operating officer for two years, leading the company’s global operating businesses across all geographies, as well as the core support functions of Starbucks supply chain, marketing, human resources, technology and mobile and digital platforms. Now serving as the president and chief executive officer, Johnson continues to make Starbucks a leading corporate force.

Product wise, Starbucks offers a range of customer favorites in its stores, at home, and on the go. There are more handcrafted beverages, including more than 30 blends and single-origin premium coffees as well as Starbucks Refreshers beverages, smoothies and teas. In addition, the company has merchandise, including brewing equipment, mugs and accessories, and packaged goods and gifts, as well as fresh food like baked pastries, sandwiches, salads, protein boxes and bowls, oatmeal, yogurt parfaits and fruit cups.

Moreover, the previous Starbucks app was widely successful, furthering both the technology and customer-focus paths. Mobile payment held a significant impact on financial success, with the mobile system reaching 20 percent of U.S. transactions. People could place their orders before even stepping foot in the store so that it would be ready when they arrived.

Starbucks has also established a College Achievement Plan in collaboration with Arizona State University (ASU). In fact, 70 percent of its U.S. employees are students or aspiring students. Because a large sum of college students struggle with remaining in school due to financial difficulties, the company believed investing in its employees and education is one of the very best investments it could make.

This offers part- and full-time employees full tuition coverage for the completion of a bachelor’s degree. The program is fostered online and allows students to choose from over 60 undergraduate degrees at ASU. It is a beneficial, interesting program that provides paid work opportunity alongside funded education. When employees give to Starbucks, the company does whatever it can to give back. It fosters a wholesome, two-sided relationship.

Also through ASU, Starbucks employees can qualify for admission. The Pathway to Admission Program, effective Feb. 7, 2017, expands the already established college plan. Those interested who do not have a college degree or previously gain admission are offered the help they need to become an ASU student. Experts from the college assist employees in filling academic history gaps by completing up to 10 freshman-level courses.

Starbucks is extremely committed to creating opportunities in any and all ways possible, including creating pathways to employment for veterans, military spouses, youth and refugees. Some of its future opportunity-creating goals are the following include employing 100,00 young adults who are disconnected from work and school known as Opportunity Youth by the year 2020. By 2022, it plans to hire 10,000 refugees searching for employment, and by 2025, it plans to hire 25,000 veterans and military spouses, as well as 25,000 graduates.

Removing itself from the brink of financial failure through persistent and strategic efforts, Starbucks pushed itself towards untested innovative areas that make the company what it is today. Starbucks created a place where people can feel welcomed as they enjoy a cup of coffee, a place between home and work. Bothered by the past troubles with disconnectedness, it plans to never return to such a dark area of company history.

Starbucks is excited about the future and welcomes everyone on its journey. It hopes to make an even stronger impact in terms of social responsibility. Since 2002, when it launched its first social responsibility report, it has surely developed a green thumb. Years ago, Schultz even changed the Starbucks logo color from brown to green because he found it to be a more affirming color. Employees can be seen wearing stand-out green aprons.

The company has reached milestones that would have before been deemed impossible, ranging from categories such as community engagement, coffee sustainability and greener retail. This has been achieved through acts of creating worldwide farmer support centers and dedicating millions of hours to community service by engaging employees in environmental leadership in more than 25,000 stores.

Working with Conservation International, Starbucks helps provide healthy trees to farmers in coffee-growing regions. Through this, they transform existing lands to be more productive rather than expanding into forests and leaving a deadly environmental footprint. Love for coffee does not supersede a vibrant and healthy natural world. Starbucks could not rightfully display green aprons of change without also having a desire to better the world.

Starbucks invests in coffee communities, sharing technical coffee knowledge and new agricultural approaches. Further goals included planting trees and utilizing renewable energy, enacting food rescue programs and reducing the environmental impact of its cups. By 2020, it plans to double the recycled content, recyclability and reusability of the cups, crafting its stores in ways that minimize its overall environmental footprint.

Also within this time frame, it plans to invest in 100 percent renewable energy for powering company operations and bring renewable projects to other countries around the world. Through a program called Partners for Sustainability, Starbucks intends to empower 10,000 employees to be sustainability champions. With a comprehensive approach to reducing impact through analyzing all aspects of the businesses as a whole, Starbucks consistently develops and implements new solutions to evoke significant change.

It is true that Starbucks would be nothing without a strong sense of community, which is why it aims to strengthen every community it serves. For example, by 2020 the company plans to rescue 100 percent of food available to donate in U.S. company-owned stores and have 100 percent of stores participate in community service. Starbucks is committed to standing as a place for public conversation and encouraging anyone and everyone to be civically engaged through service projects and promotion of voter registration.

Through setting ambitious goals and both acknowledging and resolving the pressing challenges, the company saved and proved itself to the masses. People flock to Starbucks to do things like complete homework and meet up and chat with other people. For many, visiting a Starbucks store is an integral part of their daily routine. Ultimately, Starbucks wishes for people to be able to share great coffee and for the world to become a little better.

At the end of the day, Starbucks is much more than just what it brews.

Manchester Strong: Healing Through Music

To perfectly put into words the feelings towards a tragedy such as that in Manchester is an impossible feat.


It hurts me to write about this as much as I’m sure it hurts to read about it. However, it would be more of an injustice to remain silent, to avoid the conversation and allow the incident to weaken us.


As I, along with the rest of the world, still struggle to truly comprehend the destruction of a place of utter peace, where young people flocked for the nights of their lives and to bask in the glory of music, we must come together rather than allowing terror to push us apart. We must mourn and grieve and cry and wish for a better world, but we must also stand strong, as friends, as family, as music-lovers, as good-hearted people with eyes filled with love, not blinded by hate.


Though nothing can make light of an event as terrible and selfish as such, what has brought me the slightest sense of peace is this: In their final moments, they were the happiest versions of themselves. They were on top of the world, watching their favorite artist generate an environment free of negativity of any sort.


Concerts are a place of serenity, of love, of everything good, and to have something as beautiful as that targeted is heartbreaking. Numerous artists have fought against allowing the safe-place and wholesome atmosphere of live music to be tarnished by an act of hate.


Harry Styles, whose hometown is a short distance from Manchester, turned his concert in Mexico into a short acoustic set with a moment of silence to remember the victims and their families. “We have a choice every single day we wake up of what you can put in the world, and I ask you to please choose love every single day,” he said.


His words spoke to me, simply because they were words of love, and what is most needed in the world everyday, especially during a time like this, is love. Love, with everything you are, with everything you can, with the strength to overpower any hate within your path. Love, love, love, love, love.


If I could quadruple the love in my heart and single-handedly use it to rid the entire world of hate, I would do it in a heartbeat. But it as a people, different and yet one in the same, that we will triumph. We must help each other in the healing process and confide in our love of freedom, joy and humanity. For many, this is done through the connectivity of music.


In the same way music can bring people together, music can heal. We can never repair the damages, but we should not do is allow this to let us live in fear, because to live in fear is to lose the fight. When knocked down, we will rise, stronger than ever.


Numerous artists have fought against allowing the safe-place and healing process of music to be tarnished by an act of hate. Ariana Grande fans around the world have organized meet-ups to show their respects for those lost, such as one where pink balloons, now a symbol of love and joy, were released.


In the darkest of times, music and the community it manifests is a light that may be dimmed but never fully put out.


As I struggled with what to write, my mind repeatedly took me to part of Lin-Manuel Miranda’s acceptance sonnet at the Tony Awards. I believe it is a message that perfectly expresses everything we should strive for.


“Now fill the world with music, love and pride,” he said.


And that’s exactly what we will do, together.

Maricopa County Combats Homeless Pet Overpopulation

The four-legged, furry creature presses its nose against the cold metal of its cage, tail between its legs as it whines, desperately wanting someone to take it home. It unfortunately shares this desire with hundreds of other dogs in the shelter.


As animal shelters reach capacity, Maricopa County Animal Care and Control (MCACC) is making strong efforts to reduce the homeless pet overpopulation, whether that be through special adoption events or advertising their overcrowding situation.


Their website claims that their shelters take in around 100 animals every day, adding up to nearly 600 dogs and cats at the beginning of March. At this rate, they are accounting for approximately 35,000 animals coming in and out annually.


Currently, the dogs in MCACC’s Phoenix and Mesa locations add up to over 750, the county spokeswoman Marcela Taracena told Cronkite News. The shelters do not turn away animals, which is partly where the problem lies.
According to Melissa Gable, ‎public information officer at Maricopa County Animal Care and Control, as they are taking in 100 animals, “there are days when 100 animals aren’t getting adopted or being returned to their owners,” meaning the number of animals coming in exceeds the number of animals going out.


“What has changed is our philosophy on euthanasia and trying to give the dogs and cats more time at the shelter, so as we’re doing that, it’s taking up kennel space,” Gable said. “That’s when it starts to get difficult. We’re trying to euthanize fewer animals, and it’s just a constant juggling act to also make sure we still have kennel space.”


MCACC is not a no-kill shelter, but there is no definitive timeframe for how long animals can stay, so they do what they can to provide as much time as possible. “There’s no set time. A lot of people will say ‘three days,’ but that period is actually if a dog comes to us as a stray, by law we have to hold it for 72 hours,” Gable said.  


After these 72 hours, the shelter, rather than euthanizing them immediately, has the options to either put the animals up for adoption or send them to rescue groups with which they frequently work.


Gable stressed that the process is specific to the individual animal, rather than being solely systematic. “It really depends on the dog and their temperament and health, mentally and physically. If they can stay healthy, then they can stay here for as long as possible,” she said.


The shelter tries to regularly host adoption fests; however, because they do not receive taxpayer funding, they have to remain conscious of their budget and adhere to it.


“We don’t make any money off of our adoption program anyway, so if there’s an opportunity where we can reduce the adoption fees or waive them completely, or if someone is willing to donate the money to do so, then we’ll do that,” Gable said.


Fortunately, their efforts are working. Though 35,000 animals coming into the shelter annually seems like a lot, it is actually a drastic decline from previous years when they were taking in around 60,000.


Arianna Chambers recently adopted a pet at one of many adoption festivals held throughout the year. She was lured by the announcement of a springtime event with reduced adoption fees and found the adoption process to be simple and heartening.


“We had to check it out because that’s such a small adoption fee. Also, we liked the idea of being able to save an animal who didn’t have a home,” Chambers said. “The dog we ended up picking was a stray dog, so this is the very first home he’s ever had. There are just so many animals in need of a home.”


MCACC attributes much of this success to their social media presence. On Facebook, they are constantly posting cute pictures of adoptable pets playing outside of their kennels or wearing costumes to draw attention.
Casey Coleman, a freshman at Arizona State University and Phoenix-native, fostered animals for a year and explained his process in helping the shelters. He described fostering as an easy process where volunteers attend an in-person class before being registered within the system. Foster families then provide their preferences and availability.


These are important things to consider because, according to Coleman, there are some people who do not want puppies and some people who do not want injured dogs, for example.


“No injuries seemed to be really important, so a lot of times dogs would go to a foster home just to make sure they were okay for a month before being put up for adoption, or if they were too young and needed to hit a certain age marker,” Coleman said.


He found the foster care system to be beneficial for both his family and the shelter they were assisting. By removing the dogs from shelters and putting them into private hands, they receive more hands-on attention and an easier healing period.


“It’s also important to note that with fostering, it can become a long term gig. If a dog lost a leg, it could take a year for it to function normally again. In these situations, a lot of foster homes wouldn’t actually give the dog back but instead keep them,” Coleman said. “Because of that, there’s always a need for new foster parents as the old ones fell in love and would adopt their fostered dogs.”

As MCACC combats animal homelessness overpopulation, they encourage people in the area to help in any way possible. Those interested can visit either their Phoenix or Mesa locations. For more information on how to volunteer, foster or adopt, visit maricopa.gov.

Trump’s America: Together or Divided?

Though President Donald Trump has only been in office about a month, he has had plenty of time to implement many controversial policies, appoint controversial leaders and evoke controversial conversations that have created a national divide.


Within hours of his inauguration, President Trump was paving the way towards repealing the Affordable Care Act and complimenting intelligence agencies he had denounced throughout his campaign. Now, he is strongly fighting for a travel ban that specifically targets seven predominantly Muslim countries and of which many are wary and avidly criticizing.

According to The Washington Post, “Trump has defended the executive order, saying that it is ‘not a Muslim ban’ and played down concerns that the order has to do with religion.”


However, many people, such as Grace Ramsey, a student at Arizona State University, question his intentions.


“This isn’t fixing the immigration problem because most people aren’t coming from those seven countries, and they’re just un-thought out policies that have no backing and no funding and no plans for actually improving anything. It’s just based on this sort of racist rhetoric that he used to get himself elected,” Grace Ramsey said.


Another student named Katherine Solis had similar thoughts in that “his only plan is to decrease the rate of undocumented immigrants,” and, in the long run, “for America to become more white.”


Controversy struck yet again when President Trump appointed Betsy Devos as the nation’s education secretary. DeVos, who has essentially no background in public education, has received immense scrutiny from people who feel President Trump’s appointees do not have their best interests in mind.


“I feel like he’s honestly trying to pick the most controversial people, and at the same time, I feel like some of the policies he’s implementing might be smoke and mirrors to try to distract the people of the nation from who he’s trying to appoint. Like with the Muslim ban, I feel he did it so that the whole Betsy DeVos thing would slide under the rug,” Ramsey said.